Category: Meteorology

  • 22 March 2018 | Lenticular Cloud Forecasting

    22 March 2018 | Lenticular Cloud Forecasting

    This morning, I got treated to this tubular breadstick-of-a-lenticular-cloud. Almost always seems I’m in a hurry to get somewhere when I spot these. I had to stop for at least a few minutes to grab some shots.

    It finally got me thinking how I could attempt to forecast these in advance. They tend to form downwind of the San Franciso Peaks in advance of an approaching trough…but not reliably. Seems to me that it probably isn’t as straightforward as ‘moist, stable air flowing over a mountain’. I pulled up this morning’s sounding and plotted soundings for a couple previous days when I had photographed them.

    What stood out to me so far were some common traits:

    • Elevated terrain feature – to generate eddies
    • Upper level winds around 40-50 kts with 15-25kts near terrain feature – sufficient wind speed to convert horizontal terrain interaction into sufficient vertical motion. The San Francisco Peaks reach to about the 650mb level, so I’d watch for winds beginning to pick up around that level.
    • Roughly uniderectional upper winds – to support laminar flow
    • Stable air mass – to avoid mixing and further support laminar flow
    • Dew points within 5°C of saturation at one more points in the upper air mass – to allow air to condense when it is lifted from terrain eddies
    • Dry air in lower levels – to allow clear visibility to lenticular cloud features
    • [edit 31 March 2018: a couple additional bullets added below, courtesy of feedback from John Sirlin]
    • Shallow inversion above mountain – seems I did see this on a couple soundings, so I’ll be watching for that too.
    • Orientation of flow to terrain feature – For terrain that is elongated, look for greater likelihood when flow is perpendicular to this feature. I haven’t watched for this with the San Francisco Peaks since they’re fairly symmetrical, but should be something evident with flow lofting over the Mogollon Rim.

    I want to play with those options when I get the chance now, to see how repeatable I can get with seeing that combo of elements leading to lenticular clouds. Is there a limit to how slow flow can be at the terrain feature? Does flow at 650mb even matter for the Peaks or does it still get captured if 500mb flow is strong while winds below are weak? If upper level wind direction varies by more than say 30 degrees, does it wreck the effect? What if there is a tiny bit of elevated instability – at what point does it start to interfere? How far from saturation can dew points be and still be expected to condense into lenticular clouds?

    With those options in mind, I pulled a NAM forecast sounding for this Saturday afternoon. If that forecast pans out, it could make for some lenticular action that afternoon with perhaps a cloud cap just above the mountaintop and possibly a high altitude wave off to the east-northeast. I’ll keep an eye out and see how wrong I am.

    I’ll update with how that goes

  • 19 March 2015 | Storm Chase Forecast

    19 March 2015 | Storm Chase Forecast

    I’ve been watching the GFS signals for this Thursday (19 March 2015) flicker on & off for the past week. It’s nice to see a thin glimmer of hope for tomorrow. Moisture is forecast to move up to the Red River with dew points around 60 degrees. Lapse rates aren’t so great, and NAM and GFS vary on the degree of instability from 250-500 j/kg for GFS and up to 1000 j/kg from NAM. A cold front will sag southward and into this area of instability with storms firing as it forces its way into the warm sector. A shortwave trough over the southwest will feed 40-50 knot H5 winds over the area. So this leads to the possibility for some severe storms with a lot of caveats—especially marginal instability and an undercutting cold front.

    18Z NAM shows 0-3 km Helicity maximized up to 250-350 m2/s2 narrowly along the cold front near the triple point at 00Z in the vicinity of Childress. 0-1km SRH is localized and probably barely worth noting near the triple point in the 50-100 m2/s2 range. 18Z GFS is much more conservative and also points further east—south of Wichita Falls. Obviously wouldn’t mind NAM’s optimism working out moreso than GFS at this point and I’m planning to give it a shot just in case. I’m planning to head out of Elk City with an initial target of Vernon, TX by early afternoon.